Feminism, Liberalism, Postmodernism & Beyond
Wednesday
The Power of the Blonde
Friday
Women Men and Cheating in the Digital World
Most women today are well groomed. They
are carefully made up, well-dressed, smell good, and look attractive, at least
on the outside. Modern science and technology, along with the progress of the
beauty industry, have allowed for this trend to happen. This is exactly why many
married men double cross their wives. The marriage contract is outdated and
irrelevant to our trendy and dynamic lifestyles. In the past, lifestyles were
slower paced with less exposure to beautiful women outside home. Today is a
different story. Many women look much younger than their biological age, thanks
to cosmetics, facial treatments, and plastic surgeries. Many women also look more beautiful and
attractive to men than they naturally are thanks to the makeup, the hair, and
the fashion industries. And men are surrounded by women all the time. Many of
those women are young, beautiful, smart, ambitious, and can also compete with
men on equal grounds. This has certainly increased the level of friction
between the genders and the accessibility to sex away from home. More in Beasts of Prey: The Hard Truth about Men
Saturday
A Novel Fact
I absolutely
love cartoons, especially the historic ones. In such a case we get even more
powerful humor. That of the era the cartoon was originally created at and the new
era. It's funny to look at cartoons in retrospect.
The cartoon on your left is accompanied by the following text:
Old fashioned party (with old fashioned prejudices):
"Ah! Very clever. I dare say. But I see it's written by a lady. And I want a book that my daughters may read. Give me something else!" Isn't it lovely?
Tuesday
Misadventures in Misogyny: Bloomerism | Bitch Magazine
Misadventures in Misogyny: Bloomerism | Bitch Magazine
Just stumbled upon excellent Victorian misogynistic cartoons by John Leech. Evidently, this guy hated women, especially in bloomers. While this is humorous now, it was sarcastic back in 1841, where despotic upper-class white men, either aristocratic or "self made" enjoyed exploiting women and treating them as second best.
Of course, they covered it all up elegantly by courteous gentlemanly gestures and polite talk. This period was overwhelmingly prudish and hypocritical at the same time. Thinking of it, how could they accept women in bloomers if covering the tables' legs was the norm?
Just stumbled upon excellent Victorian misogynistic cartoons by John Leech. Evidently, this guy hated women, especially in bloomers. While this is humorous now, it was sarcastic back in 1841, where despotic upper-class white men, either aristocratic or "self made" enjoyed exploiting women and treating them as second best.
Of course, they covered it all up elegantly by courteous gentlemanly gestures and polite talk. This period was overwhelmingly prudish and hypocritical at the same time. Thinking of it, how could they accept women in bloomers if covering the tables' legs was the norm?
One is not born a woman but becomes one
In her seminal work "The second sex", De Beauvoir criticizes the "destiny traditionally offered to women by society" through socialization into "feminine gender roles" which made women focus on their looks rather than on education, career, or fulfillment of personal goals.
Despite the fact that we're a couple of decades ahead, we can't be blind to the fact that women are still expected to compromise on their careers and self aspirations for the sake of others.
One example: some women are still expected to take their husband's last names rather than keep their own names after the wedding. And once the kids are born, the kids are given their father's surnames not their mother's. Although the name issue might seem minor, it is definitely symbolic.
One example: some women are still expected to take their husband's last names rather than keep their own names after the wedding. And once the kids are born, the kids are given their father's surnames not their mother's. Although the name issue might seem minor, it is definitely symbolic.
Saturday
Salvador Dali - Sleep 1937
Dali’s “Sleep” of 1937 deals with a Freudian theme of the world of dreams that has fascinated the Surrealists who believed that the freedom of the subconscious within sleep could be tapped into and then realized creatively in their art. This painting is an attempt to duplicate the dream world into canvas.
“Sleep” is virtually a visual rendering of the body's collapse into sleep, as if it was a collapse into a separate condition of being. Against a deep blue summer sky, a huge disembodied head with eyes dissolved in sleep, hangs suspended over an almost bare landscape. The head is "soft", vulnerable and distorted. And what should be a neck tapers away to drop limply over a crutch. A dog appears on the left, its head in a crutch too, as if half asleep itself.
The head is supported above land by a series of wooden crutches. The mouth, nose and also eyes are all held in place by the crutches, suggesting that the head might collapse if they were removed. Crutches are a familiar motif in Dali’s works. As Dali attests in his book, The Secret Life of Salvador Dali, “I have often imagined the monster of sleep as a heavy, giant head with a tapering body held up by the crutches of reality. When the crutches break we have the sensation of falling.”
Analysis: some aesthetic principles of "good design" applied in this painting:
1. Hierarchy - the center of painting, the most important figure is the huge sleeping head supported by the crutches. It is the most significant part of the message that deals with the subconscious (of the head) and its dreams.
2. Emphasis and focus - is put visually on the sleeping head by magnifying it to a gigantic size, positioning it in the center, and coloring it in light yellowish colors contrasted with the light blue sky.
3. Contrast – the colors (light yellow Vs. blue) are contrasted to accentuate the head as the main figure. In addition, the head’s size is contrasted to the real world’s size represented by the dog figure on the left, and the castle far away, on the right. The magnification of the head and its distortion help to focus the viewer’s eyes on the head in a dramatic scenery.
4. Tension- is created between the dripping part of the head on the right, and the facial features on the left. The right side may allude to male sexuality that might be exhausted or dormant during sleep. Another tension might relate to the pain caused by the crutches on the face, another Freudian issue.
5. Balance - is a prominent element. The heavy sleepy head is supported by several crutches that are much lighter in weight than the head; suggesting that if they fall, the head might crash. As it might be easy to fall asleep, however the wakefulness and reality are much stronger.
6. Rhythm - is created by using several crutches rather than one to support the parts of the face. The crutches’ positioning in the painting is balanced and harmonic--suggesting continuity between the dream (represented by the sleepy head) and the reality (represented by the crutches.)
7. Flow – the viewer’s eyes are led on the head to the parts held by the crutches, i.e., eyes, nose, lips, chin, and dripping neck. Then, the viewer notices, one unused crutch, a castle in perspective, and the dog on the left-- all of which are meant to capture attention to the head itself.
8. Depth – is created using perspective. The head in the front, while the faraway castle on the right, and the dog on the left create a 3D like positioning, emphasizing the head in the center.
9. Scale – an illusion of size is created by magnifying the head and positioning it in contrast to the castle and the dog. In addition, the head is distorted to focus the viewer’s attention on its prominence in the painting.
10. Movement - is created from the head parts on the left toward the dripping neck on the right. This might have an emotional effect on the viewer, even a subconscious one.
11. Unity – a consistent style of imagery is used. The central part is magnified and distorted. The crutches balance the parts coherently, and the other figures in perspective add in harmoniously to create an overall impression of the painting as united.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)